? Alpine Route Difficulty Classification (International Standard)
This grading system evaluates the overall seriousness and difficulty of a route, considering: length, altitude, cold, exposure, objective danger, remoteness/commitment, and technical difficulty.
Originally derived from UIAA Roman numerals, the system is now commonly expressed using French alpine letter grades and is widely adopted worldwide, including in the Himalayas.
⚫ ED – Extrêmement Difficile (Extremely Difficult)
The most demanding alpine routes
Continuous, high-level technical difficulty
Extreme exposure, altitude, and commitment
Typical Terrain: Severe rock/ice/mixed climbing at altitude Experience Level: Elite climbers with expedition experience
Fitness Level Requirements (Updated & Practica
? Basic Fitness (F / PD)
Good general fitness
Comfortable with long trekking days
Comparable to Munro-bagging or multi-day hiking
Average Rucksack Weight: 6–8 kg
? Good Cardiovascular Fitness (AD / D)
Strong aerobic endurance
Regular training through hiking, running, cycling, or gym work
Ability to perform long days at altitude
Average Rucksack Weight: 8–12 kg
? High Fitness (TD)
Excellent cardiovascular and muscular endurance
High physical resilience
Ability to carry heavy loads for extended periods
Average Rucksack Weight: 12–18 kg
⚫ Extreme Fitness (ED)
Peak physical conditioning required
Prolonged exertion at extreme altitude
Weight loss, fatigue, and long recovery periods are common
Training Requirement: Months of structured endurance, strength, and altitude preparation
Important Note
Route grades do not only measure technical climbing. They represent the overall seriousness of the route — including altitude, remoteness, weather exposure, and rescue limitations, which are especially relevant in Nepal and the greater Himalayas.